The MY-IVL Study: LithiX™ Hertz Contact intravascular lithotripsy in complex and high-risk PCI populations

HC-IVL demonstrates effective calcium modification in complex and high-risk PCI

The MY-IVL clinical study was an investigator-sponsored post market study designed to assess the safety and performance of Hertz Contact Intravascular Lithotripsy (HC-IVL) to treat calcified, stenotic, coronary lesions prior to PCI in real-world practice. This all-comers study was comprised of complex patient population presenting with diverse calcium morphologies.

This clinical experience demonstrated HC-IVL is effective in modifying calcified coronary lesions across complex and high-risk patient populations. Imaging conducted in the study confirmed consistent plaque fracture and vessel expansion, supporting its use in challenging anatomies and lesion types.

Baseline clinical presentation:

§, Unstable angina, STEMI or NSTEMI.
‡, Stable angina or silent ischemia.

Key baseline lesion characteristics:

Key findings:

The MY-IVL Study outcomes demonstrated effective and safe fragmentation of diverse, severely calcified lesion morphologies in a complex all-comers patient population. HC-IVL provides a mechanical calcium modification approach designed to enable vessel expansion, while minimizing procedural complexity, particularly in high-risk and complex lesions.

Mean stent expansion post-PCI:

(scroll horizontally to read entire table)

Calcium Eccentricity Eccentric Calcium Concentric Calcium Overall
Maximum continuous calcium arc, ° ≤180° >180° and ≤270° >270° and ≤360°
Mean stent expansion‡, %
123.15 ± 13.81
(L=13)
106.77 ± 18.30
(L=13)
110.96 ± 17.97
(L=27)
113.71 ± 17.80
(L=58)

Of the 58 lesions with mean stent expansion, 53 had baseline calcium arc available.

Imaging Core Lab adjudicated.

Angiographic outcomes:

Final Post-PCI L=116
Acute gain, mm 1.75 ± 0.58
Minimum lumen diameter, mm 2.65 ± 0.56
In-lesion DS, %
10.71 ± 11.49
In-lesion DS <50%
116 (100.0%)
In-lesion DS <30%
109 (94.0%)

Imaging Core Lab adjudicated.

Procedural safety outcomes:
  • No IVL-device related angiographic complications*
  • Freedom from MACE (30 days): 98 (96.1%)**

*, One subject had perforation that occurred during stent deployment (not HC-IVL related).
**, No device related events were reported – Three cardiovascular deaths (CVDs) were assessed by the site as not related to the HC-IVL procedure; one death had unknown cause

Co-primary effectiveness endpoint – 1:

Proportion of subjects with residual stenosis <30%, and without intra-procedural MACE

0 %

(Patients who received DES treatment post HC-IVL)

Met co-primary effectiveness endpoint – 2:

Minimum Stent Area (MSA) for stented lesion after HC-IVL (Powered)

Performance goal † :

0 mm²

p <0.0001

Mean MSA:

0 mm²

(95% CI: 6.50-7.28)

Imaging Core Lab adjudicated. †, PG derived from the average MSA 5.65 ± 0.75 mm². , OCT/IVUS measurements available: 94 lesions

Study design:
  • 102 consecutive patients treated with HC-IVL
    • Enrolled at Cardiac Vascular Sentral Kuala Lumpur (CVSKL) Hospital between April and September 2025
  • Angiography and 100% intravascular imaging (IVUS/OCT)
    • All images adjudicated by the core laboratory – MedStar Health
  • Primary Safety Endpoint: Freedom from MACE* within 30 days of the index procedure
  • Co-Primary Effectiveness Endpoint – 1: The proportion of subjects with residual stenosis <30%, including both stenting and DCB treatment, and without intra-procedural MACE
  • Powered Co-Primary Effectiveness Endpoint – 2: Minimum Stent Area (MSA) (compared to ≥ 4.9 mm2PG**), as assessed by intravascular imaging, stenting cohort only
  • 30-day clinical follow up

*MACE defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization
**Performance Goal (PG) was derived from the average MSA (5.65 mm2) reported in prior IVL and RA studies1-3 with a statistical margin of 0.75 mm2

1Honton B, et al. ICARE trial, EuroPCR 20252Abdelhakim A, et al. CCI. 2022 Nov;100(6):979-9893Ziad A, et al. Circ Interv. 2023, 16(10): e012898

Let's Get Cracking

Ready to break free from the limitations of console-based lithotripsy? Fill out the form and a representative will schedule a meeting as soon as possible.

Frequently asked questions about treating complex calcified lesions

In real-world practice, calcified coronary lesions rarely present in isolation or in ideal anatomy. Physicians are often treating patients with:

  • Complex vessel geometry
  • Severe calcification
  • Multiple comorbidities
  • Acute or unstable presentations

These factors make lesion preparation more difficult, limit device deliverability, and increase the risk of incomplete stent expansion. 

The results of the MY-IVL investigator-initiated, all-comers study demonstrated real-world effectiveness in treating complex calcified coronary lesions.

The MY-IVL study observed HC-IVL treatment for 102 consecutive patients at a center, providing a real-world, all-comers analysis. Patients in the study included:

  • Eccentric and concentric calcium
  • Calcified nodules
  • Long, diffuse calcific disease
  • High-risk clinical presentations

The MY-IVL study specifically evaluated this type of real-world population. The results demonstrated that calcium fragmentation can be performed safely and effectively with HC-IVL even in complex, high-risk cases.

Drug-eluting stents and bioadaptors rely on vessel compliance to expand properly and provide support for the diseased coronary artery in PCI. When calcium is rigid and unmodified:

  • Stents may under-expand
  • Minimum stent area (MSA) may be suboptimal
  • Long-term outcomes can be compromised

Calcium fragmentation changes the mechanical properties of the lesion, allowing:

  • Greater lumen gain
  • More complete stent expansion
  • Improved procedural success

The MY-IVL study showed optimal levels of stent expansion were achieved across different calcium morphologies. The results confirmed the effectiveness of HC-IVL in coronary calcium modifcation.

Intravascular lithotripsy has emerged as a valuable tool for calcium modification. IVL is particularly useful in complex lesions where traditional approaches may be limited. In the MY-IVL study:

  • 100% of lesions achieved <50% residual stenosis post-PCI
  • 94% achieved <30% residual stenosis
  • Mean stent expansion exceeded performance goals

These results demonstrate that calcium fragmentation using IVL can support consistent procedural success, even in challenging real-world scenarios.

Yes, but this is one of the most difficult aspects of PCI. Patients often present with a mix of:

  • Eccentric calcium
  • Concentric calcium
  • Varying calcium arc severity

The MY-IVL study showed that calcium fragmentation using Hertz Contact IVL was effective across these diverse morphologies. Strong stent expansion outcomes were also observed regardless of calcium distribution.

Safety is a critical concern, particularly in complex patient populations.

In the MY-IVL study:

  • No IVL device-related angiographic complications were reported
  • Freedom from MACE at 30 days was 96.1%
  • No device-related adverse events were identified

These findings support the use of HC-IVL as a safe approach to calcium modification in PCI, even with complex lesions and high-risk patients.

Lesion complexity directly influences:

  • Device selection
  • Procedural approach
  • Risk of complications

In real-world PCI, physicians must adapt to:

  • Tortuous vessels
  • Severe calcification
  • Multi-lesion or multi-vessel disease

Technologies that can perform consistently across these variables are particularly valuable in complex cases.

PMN 2504 Rev A

Step 1 of 4

أجب عن بضعة الأسئلة للتحقق من أعراضك

هل تشعر بانقباض أو ضغط أو ضيق في صدرك من حين لآخر أو كثيرًا؟
هل تشعر بألم في الصدر أو ضيق في التنفس بعد القيام بأنشطة خفيفة مثل المشي أو البستنة؟

PMN 1777 Rev A